AFA Documentation
Breadcrumbs

Workflow For Evaluation of Developed Reserves in Unconventional Reservoirs

From the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers (SPEE) Monograph 4 , the following workflow (modified From Erdle [2017] and John Seidle [2017]) is suggested the following.

Step



1

Assess Data Viability and Correlation


2

Construct Diagnostic Plots

Refer to Pseudo RTA methods:

Pressure Normalized Decline Analysis

Specialized Plots

Flowing Material Balance

3

Identify Flow Regimes which may include MFHW Linear & Compound linear flow, as well as PSS. According to Lee [2013], the minimum flow regime plot is Log[q] vs Log [t]

4

Analyse with Simple Models

Refer to:

Arp's Decline &

Decline for Unconventional Reservoirs

5

Analyse and Forecast with analytical models such as RTA and/or PSS. Peter Best [2017 of Credit Suisse suggested doing group runs or RTA and generating a base type well from the analysis.

Strickland, Purvis,and & Blasingame [2011] indicated:

  • “due to the variability in reservoir parameters, completion techniques, and operating conditions, production forecasts should be performed on a well-by-well basis”.

  • “Whether simulation or RTA, “results should be tempered with good judgement”.

Refer to:

FMB and Rate Transient Analysis (RTA) &

PSS Models

RTA Diagnostics include:

Normalized Pressure Integral (NPI)

Blasingame

Beta

Chow Pressure Group (CPG)

6

History Match with Numerical Simulator


Strickland, Purvis, & Blasingame [2011]

  • Simulation, rate-transient analysis, and decline curves can be used to forecast production from shale wells with reasonable accuracy – when used appropriately.

  • If the quantity (or quality of the data) is sufficient to use all three (3) of the methods, decline curve analysis is likely to be the most subject to error, especially during early-times.

  • Decline curves should be informed by simulation or rate-transient analysis when feasible.

The SPEE workflow follows the work of Blasingame [2019] very closely as shown in the figure below:

image-20241031-050441.png

References:

  • Jim Erdle, “An Overview of SPEE Monograph # 4 “Estimating Ultimate Recovery of Developed Wells in Low-Permeability Reservoirs”, 16 May 2017, Ryder Scott Conference

  • John Seidle “Adaptation of SPEE Monograph 4 to Wyoming Horizontal Plays“, October 12, 2017

  • Peter Best, SPEE Monograph 4: Current Best Practice for Estimating Ultimate Recovery of Developed Wells in Low-Permeability Reservoirs. November 16, 2016.

  • R. Strickland, D. Purvis, & T. A. Blasingame, Practical Aspects of Reserve Determination for Shale Gas, SPE 144357, 2011.

  • T. A. Blasingame, Reservoir Engineering Aspects & Forecasting of Well Performance in Unconventional Reservoirs, SPEE Presentation, 02 May 2019, Brookhaven College.