AFA Documentation
Breadcrumbs

Cleat Porosity

Introduction

According to Cox, coal porosity has a significant impact on well performance. With all other factors being equal, wells with higher porosity exhibit:

  • Extended dewatering

  • Lower gas rates

  • Slower depletion

In conventional reservoirs, porosity can be based on either cores or well logs. However, coal porosity is far more difficult to determine as cleats can relax and rearrange slightly as a resulting of coring and retrieval. In the past, given the low porosity of coals it was difficult to determine as it was masked by factors such as coal density, ash content, and other materials.

Cleat Porosity vs Permeability

The plot below shows a basic relationship of cleat permeability as a function of cleat porosity (and spacing)

image-20230914-231033.png
Cleat permeability vs Cleat Porosity (Seidle, 2011)


Pseudo-Porosity for Coal

Although the mathematics is not shown here, if the following coals were analyzed as a sandstone reservoir, they would have the following equivalent values:

Basin

Pseudo-Porosity ( % )

Northern Appalachian Basin

59

Central Appalachian Basin

50

Southern Appalachian Basin

59

San Juan Basin

55

Illinois Basin

54

References:

  • Thakur, Pramod, Advanced Reservoir and Production Engineering for Coalbed Methane, 2017, Gulf Professional Publishing

  • Cox, Dave, PE 598: Coalbed Methane, 2001, Colorado School of Mines

  • John Seidle, Fundamentals of Coalbed Methane Reservoir Engineering, 2011 PennWell Corporation